Login
Public area
Home
Background
Benchmarks
Register
Published Results
Statistics
Participant area
Login
Upload
Pending Algorithms
Tested Algorithms
Download
Past editions
FVC2006
FVC2004
FVC2002
FVC2000
Result of algorithm NTNU 1.0 on SMAD-SOTAMD_P&S-1.0
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
54.37% (54.36% - 54.38%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Efficiency indicators
Avg Detection Time
Avg Detection Time (BF)
Avg Detection Time (M)
Not measured
Not measured
Not measured
Memory indicators
Max Detection Memory
Not measured
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Summary of Subset Accuracy Indicators
Subset
Bona Fide
Morphing
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
Morphing Factor=0.3
1096
1853
55.18% (55.15% - 55.20%)
0%
0%
0%
Morphing Factor=0.5
1096
1850
53.74% (53.73% - 53.74%)
0%
0%
0%
Female
460
1661
56.59% (56.52% - 56.65%)
0%
0%
0%
Male
636
2042
52.18% (52.15% - 52.20%)
0%
0%
0%
African Ethnicity
160
915
53.76% (53.75% - 53.77%)
0%
0%
0%
East Asian Ethnicity
53
332
47.38% (47.17% - 47.59%)
0%
0%
0%
European/American Ethnicity
760
2296
53.45% (53.42% - 53.48%)
0%
0%
0%
Indian/Asian Ethnicity
66
310
52.97% (52.90% - 53.03%)
0%
0%
0%
Middle Eastern Ethnicity
57
353
44.17% (43.86% - 44.48%)
0%
0%
0%
Age: 18-35
636
2425
54.26% (54.25% - 54.27%)
0%
0%
0%
Age: 36-55
348
1627
56.87% (56.85% - 56.90%)
0%
0%
0%
Age: 56-75
112
544
54.44% (54.41% - 54.46%)
0%
0%
0%
Trait: Freckels
80
586
46.67% (46.25% - 47.10%)
0%
0%
0%
Trait: Moles
126
893
51.55% (51.51% - 51.59%)
0%
0%
0%
No Specific Trait
759
3196
52.29% (52.28% - 52.31%)
0%
0%
0%
Hochshule Darmstadt Images
500
900
43.48% (43.40% - 43.56%)
0%
0%
0%
Norwegian University of Science and Technology Images
296
1203
57.10% (57.09% - 57.11%)
0%
0%
0%
University of Twente Images
300
1600
50.45% (50.33% - 50.56%)
0%
0%
0%
Compressed Images
896
3323
53.45% (53.45% - 53.46%)
0%
0%
0%
Uncompressed Images
200
380
31.92% (31.84% - 32.00%)
0%
0%
0%
Automatic Post-processing
1096
1453
58.30% (58.29% - 58.30%)
0%
0%
0%
Manual Post-processing
1096
2250
51.17% (51.16% - 51.19%)
0%
0%
0%
Morphing Algorithm: C01
1096
500
44.61% (44.60% - 44.62%)
0%
0%
0%
Morphing Algorithm: C02
1096
500
33.83% (33.80% - 33.85%)
0%
0%
0%
Morphing Algorithm: C03
1096
1264
68.94% (68.91% - 68.98%)
0%
0%
0%
Morphing Algorithm: C05
1096
939
52.92% (52.92% - 52.93%)
0%
0%
0%
Morphing Algorithm: C06
1096
500
56.58% (56.57% - 56.60%)
0%
0%
0%
Manual Post-process: PM01
1096
200
27.48% (27.46% - 27.50%)
0%
0%
0%
Manual Post-process: PM02
1096
500
33.83% (33.80% - 33.85%)
0%
0%
0%
Manual Post-process: PM03
1096
411
84.15% (84.12% - 84.18%)
0%
0%
0%
Manual Post-process: PM05
1096
639
52.15% (52.11% - 52.19%)
0%
0%
0%
Manual Post-process: PM06
1096
500
56.58% (56.57% - 56.60%)
0%
0%
0%
Low Quality Morphed Images
1096
1783
55.57% (55.57% - 55.58%)
0%
0%
0%
High Quality Morphed Images
1096
1920
53.65%
0%
0%
0%
Overall
1096
3703
54.37% (54.36% - 54.38%)
0%
0%
0%
Subset: Morphing Factor=0.3
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
1853
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
55.18% (55.15% - 55.20%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Morphing Factor=0.5
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
1850
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
53.74% (53.73% - 53.74%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Female
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
460
1661
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
56.59% (56.52% - 56.65%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Male
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
636
2042
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
52.18% (52.15% - 52.20%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: African Ethnicity
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
160
915
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
53.76% (53.75% - 53.77%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: East Asian Ethnicity
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
53
332
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
47.38% (47.17% - 47.59%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: European/American Ethnicity
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
760
2296
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
53.45% (53.42% - 53.48%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Indian/Asian Ethnicity
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
66
310
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
52.97% (52.90% - 53.03%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Middle Eastern Ethnicity
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
57
353
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
44.17% (43.86% - 44.48%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Age: 18-35
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
636
2425
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
54.26% (54.25% - 54.27%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Age: 36-55
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
348
1627
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
56.87% (56.85% - 56.90%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Age: 56-75
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
112
544
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
54.44% (54.41% - 54.46%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Trait: Freckels
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
80
586
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
46.67% (46.25% - 47.10%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Trait: Moles
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
126
893
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
51.55% (51.51% - 51.59%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: No Specific Trait
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
759
3196
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
52.29% (52.28% - 52.31%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Hochshule Darmstadt Images
Description: Images acquired at Hochshule Darmstadt location.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
500
900
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
43.48% (43.40% - 43.56%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Norwegian University of Science and Technology Images
Description: Images acquired at Norwegian University of Science and Technology location.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
296
1203
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
57.10% (57.09% - 57.11%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: University of Twente Images
Description: Images acquired at University of Twente location.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
300
1600
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
50.45% (50.33% - 50.56%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Compressed Images
Description: Images stored using a lossy image format (JPG, JP2000).
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
896
3323
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
53.45% (53.45% - 53.46%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Uncompressed Images
Description: Images stored using a lossless image format.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
200
380
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
31.92% (31.84% - 32.00%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Automatic Post-processing
Description: Morphed images obtained without manual post-processing.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
1453
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
58.30% (58.29% - 58.30%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Manual Post-processing
Description: Morphed images obtained applying manual post-processing.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
2250
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
51.17% (51.16% - 51.19%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Morphing Algorithm: C01
Description: Hochshule Darmstadt method based on FaceMorpher.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
500
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
44.61% (44.60% - 44.62%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Morphing Algorithm: C02
Description: Hochshule Darmstadt method based on FaceFusion.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
500
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
33.83% (33.80% - 33.85%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Morphing Algorithm: C03
Description: Norwegian University of Science and Technology method based on FaceMorph.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
1264
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
68.94% (68.91% - 68.98%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Morphing Algorithm: C05
Description: University of Bologna method based on triangulation with DLIB landmarks.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
939
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
52.92% (52.92% - 52.93%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Morphing Algorithm: C06
Description: University of Twente method based on triangulation with STASTM-landmarks.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
500
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
56.58% (56.57% - 56.60%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Manual Post-process: PM01
Description: Hochshule Darmstadt manual post-processing using GIMP.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
200
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
27.48% (27.46% - 27.50%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Manual Post-process: PM02
Description: Hochshule Darmstadt manual post-processing using GIMP.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
500
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
33.83% (33.80% - 33.85%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Manual Post-process: PM03
Description: Norwegian University of Science and Technology manual post-processing using Photoshop.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
411
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
84.15% (84.12% - 84.18%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Manual Post-process: PM05
Description: University of Bologna manual post-processing using GIMP.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
639
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
52.15% (52.11% - 52.19%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Manual Post-process: PM06
Description: University of Twente manual post-processing using GIMP.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
500
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
56.58% (56.57% - 56.60%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: Low Quality Morphed Images
Description: Morphed images rejected at face verification stage by at least one face recognition SDK between Neurotechnology and Cognitec.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
1783
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
55.57% (55.57% - 55.58%)
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Subset: High Quality Morphed Images
Description: Morphed images accepted at face verification stage by both Neurotechnology and Cognitec face recognition SDKs.
Attempts
Bona Fide
Morphing
1096
1920
Accuracy indicators
EER
BSCER
10
BSCER
20
BSCER
100
53.65%
0%
0%
0%
Detection failures
REJ
NBFRA
REJ
NMRA
0%
0%
Graphs
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Score distributions
MACER(t) and BSCER(t) graphs
DET graph
Description of algorithm NTNU 1.0
Algorithm type:
NIST dynamic library
A - Brief description
B - References
For information or suggestions:
fvc@unibo.it
Copyright © 2025 Biometric System Laboratory